On Friday 2012-06-29 23:36, David Hajoglou wrote: >I hope the message subject will make it to the appropriate thread, but >if not, I'm responding to >http://marc.info/?l=netfilter&m=132671646831409 This post references dl.medozas.de, which has been replaced by dl.inai.de in the meantime. >In short, the original problem was linked to a missing >/usr/include/libnfnetlink/linux_nfnetlink.h libnetfilter_queue provides its own copies of certain headers exactly because they may not be present (or present and too old) in /usr/include. >I too had the same problem but it was with an RRM of libnfnetlink form >the epel repo >http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/repoview/libnfnetlink-devel.html > After getting a hold of the source rpm off that repo I found that >they're patching to remove both linux_nfnetlink.h and >linux_nfnetlink_compat.h and instead, pointing libnfnetlink.h at the >kernel header nfnetlink.h. epel bugs to epel people. >I'm not sure if this is a good thing or bad thing as it impacted my >ability to build DAQ (for snort). My install of libnetfilter_queue >references #include <libnfnetlink/linux_nfnetlink.h> which makes the >install of DAQ fail. An original libnetfilter_queue also has that line -- commented out. #include <libnfnetlink/libnfnetlink.h> // #include <libnfnetlink/liunx_nfnetlink.h> #include <libnetfilter_queue/linux_nfnetlink_queue.h> > I could patch and rebuild libnetfilter_queue or >I could rebuild libnfnetlink, or I could make some hacky edits here >and there. It is friday and beer drinking might just be in order for >these fixes so no telling what I might attempt :) You could grab libnetfilter_queue - or for that matter the entire stack - from dl.inai.de/repos/CentOS_6 and see if that works. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
