On 14/04/2012 11:54 a.m., nullv@xxxxxxx wrote:
It can't be. it's a link-local address
The difference between IPv4 and IPv6. IPv4 has no link-local limitation
outside of 127.0.0.0/8 built into the hardware, it *can* leak into the
WAN if you configure things non-standard.
AYJ
------Original Message------
From: Ethy H. Brito
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:03:46 +1200
Al Grant wrote:
Hiya All,
I am after a little guidance please on the following problem:
My topology is as follows:
inet----router 192.168.1.254-------wlan0 192.168.1.71&& eth0
192.168.70.121------ip camera 192.168.70.140:80
Note:
(1) eth0 and wlan0 are on a PC running Ubuntu.
(2) Port 5555 on the router is forwarded to 80 on 192.168.1.71
(2) in sysctl I have set sysctl net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
Now what I need to do is to be able to access the IP camera from the
inet.
So I have tried adding IPTables:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i wlan0 -d 192.168.1.71 -p tcp --dport
5555 -j DNAT --to 192.168.70.140:80
Now this should allow me to access the camera by pointing a web
browser to the real world public ip on port 5555, however I get page
cannot be displayed.
Hi
just to be sure: 192.168.1.71 is NOT your "real world public ip", is it?
Ethy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
N‹§²æìr¸›yúèšØb²X¬¶Ç§vØ^–)Þº{.nÇ+‰·§z×â–׫Š{ayº ʇڙë,j¢f£¢·hš‹àz¹ ®w¥¢¸ ¢·¦j:+v‰¨ŠwèjØm¶Ÿÿ¾«‘êçzZ+ƒùšŽŠÝ¢j"?ú!tml=
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
