Re: [iptables] Implement huge amount of iptables make system crash

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 2011-12-04 14:34, Léo Cavaillé wrote:

>Hello everyone,
>
>I recently tested a new environment to account some traffic on my
>network with some iptables rules
>
>1) I have got 2 rules (one for in and one for out stream) per IP I want
>to account. Since I account some contiguous adresses I wondered if a
>binary tree starting with the first IP of my /19 and then chaining
>through different tables to reach a single IP leaf will result in a
>logarithmic complexity rather than linear…

Yes, Jesper Brouer wrote some Perl code that takes care of automatically 
producing a fanned tree like that.

>So far I am adding the whole set of rules with a perl script using
>libiptc to commit only once the rules to netfilter.
>
>
>2) These ~62k rules are not really significant for the load of my
>firewall. But unfortunately, I had sometimes in my tests to manage some big 
>failures, where an iptables command (-Z, -A or -L) is stuck on the system 
>and then one of my cores is used at 100% and the load increases, and generally 
>I get this kernel alert :
>http://pastebin.com/F1DL7ZZT

Keep in mind that the ruleset is replaced for each HW thread and thus 
puts big requirements on memory available; as such though, I would have 
expected an OOM message rather than a Unable To Handle Kernel Paging 
Request.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux