As requested by you # iptables-save # Generated by iptables-save v1.3.5 on Wed Oct 19 18:02:11 2011 *nat :PREROUTING ACCEPT [11:2277] :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE COMMIT # Completed on Wed Oct 19 18:02:11 2011 # Generated by iptables-save v1.3.5 on Wed Oct 19 18:02:11 2011 *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [26929:5199639] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [1534:2322150] COMMIT # Completed on Wed Oct 19 18:02:11 2011 Regards, Ajith On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Oct 19, 2011 10:17 AM, "Ajith Adapa" <adapa.ajith@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> As you asked in last mail the output of iptables-save -t filter is >> >> *filter >> :INPUT ACCEPT [3902:2580916] >> :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] >> :OUTPUT ACCEPT [940:2242708] >> COMMIT >> > > Another possibility: a wayward rule in raw table. > > Please post the output of iptables-save (without any parameters) > > Rgds, > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
