Re: Regarding iptable rules for SNAT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/17/2011 8:42 PM, Ajith Adapa wrote:
I have a following setup. GW eth1 (private ip) is connected to the ISP
router. For host H1 I have set the DNS server as 10.12.3.10.

H1 (eth0) --- (eth0) GW (eth1) ---
H1 eth0 = 192.168.1.2
GW eth0 = 192.168.1.1
GW eth1 = 10.12.3.12
DNS = 10.12.3.10

I have added a rule in GW saying iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o
eth1 -j MASQUERADE

Now when I am trying to access internet from host H1, DNS queries are
being sent to 10.12.3.10 which are masqueraded in GW. Once replies
come back from DNS server then GW is replying back to DNS server with
icmp destination unreachable.

If there's no reason to SNAT/masquerade traffic from eth0 to a host on eth1 (10.12.3.*), you can try inserting an ACCEPT rule in the POSTROUTING table just before the MASQUERADE rule, to prevent the traffic from 192.168.1.* to 10.12.3.* having its source address changed in flight:

# iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o eth1 -m comment --comment "dont masq stuff from private net to DMZ net" -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 10.12.3.0/24 -j ACCEPT # iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o eth1 -m comment --comment "masq everything else" -j MASQUERADE

Ideal cases once the reply comes back GW has to send it to the host H1 right ?

Sorry if I am wrong or missed any steps down here ?

Regards,
Ajith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux