On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 15:57 -0400, Optimum Wireless Services wrote: > Hi, is me once again. > > I tried this for a test box and the download speed worked correctly: > > $tc qdisc del dev eth0 root > $tc class del dev eth0 > > $tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb r2q 1 > > $tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 3000kbit ceil > 3000kbit > > $tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:100 htb rate 256kbit ceil > 256kbit prio 3 > > $tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip u32 match ip dst > 172.16.254.1/32 classid 1:100 > > $tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:100 handle 100: sfq perturb 2 > > > So, are these ruleset more convenient than the one I currently have? > They are more efficient, yes, and in some ways more convenient, but you lose some of the flexibility you had with marking packets. Horses for courses really. Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
