Re: POSTROUTING SNAT only reply packets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok,

Thanks for the replies, I was doing some tests to asure the connection issues. It's compulsory that the load balancer receive the return packets.


El 17/01/11 11:55, Giles Coochey escribió:
On 17/01/2011 11:38, Gáspár Lajos wrote:
Hi,

2011-01-17 11:16 keltezéssel, GMail Isaac Gonzalez írta:
Hi,


I've doing some testing and seems that iptables only do SNAT on NEW connections, and I need to change the ip address of replied packets. Anybody know some workaround? If anobody do not know some workaround can you confirm that it's not posible to do this with iptables?

read again the NAT part in the manual:
man iptables

nat table:
              nat:
This table is consulted when a packet that creates a new connection is encountered. It consists of three built-ins: PREROUTING (for altering packets as soon as they come in), OUTPUT (for altering locally-gener- ated packets before routing), and POSTROUTING (for altering packets as they are about to go out).

DNAT target:

   DNAT
This target is only valid in the nat table, in the PREROUTING and OUTPUT chains, and user-defined chains which are only called from those chains. It specifies that the destination address of the packet should be modified (and all future packets in this connection will also be mangled), and rules should cease being examined. It takes one type of option:

SNAT target:

   SNAT
This target is only valid in the nat table, in the POSTROUTING chain. It specifies that the source address of the packet should be modified (and all future packets in this connection will also be mangled), and rules should
       cease being examined.  It takes one type of option:


I've tried the next ip tables rules and only work when I do NEW connections from the web server.

-A POSTROUTING -o br0 -s WE_SERVER_ADDR -p tcp -m tcp --sport 80 --dport 1024:65535 -j SNAT --to-source LOAD_BALANCER_ADDR

Thanks in advance.

Isaac González


You should do all of the NAT-ing ON THE LOAD BALANCER:


I have to agree - if you are doing NAT you want to avoid any type of asymmetric routing - especially you NEED to make sure that the device that is doing the NAT (be it for load balancing or other reasons) receives the return packets. You cannot keep a TCP connection going if there is not some sort of state information being shared between the devices otherwise.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux