Hello, I encountered a system today with two attached networks, one public and the other RFC1918. The box had ip_foward=1, FORWARD chain empty, policy ACCEPT. rp_filter was set on both the interfaces. Now if I were somewhere off the public interface, but many hops away, there is no possible way to get packets to the RFC1918 side of the box is there? Because I have no way to actually route the packets to the gateway with destination addresses on the far side. So actually this box is safe from malicious activity, even though there is an ACCEPT policy on FORWARD and it's set with routing enabled. Is this correct? Now if instead I have control of a station on the same segment as the gateway's public interface, or if I control routers in-between and can set up routes to get packets to the box with the internal IPs as destinations, then it's a different story. But in the common case of having ISPs in between (which will drop my packets with RFC1918 destinations), it's not possible to get packets to the gateway's internal network except if they NAT some of them for me. Please help me to see if my understanding is correct. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html