Re: IPv6 routing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, Thomas Jacob wrote:

> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 14:42 +0200, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> 
> > Please check out RFC 4890: Recommendations for Filtering ICMPv6 Messages 
> > in Firewalls, which discusses ICMPv6 filtering in details. It even comes 
> > with an example shell script for netfilter/ip6tables in the appendix.
> 
> Are you sure that this is still accurate for current kernels? 
> 
> For instance, I would have assumed that things like
> destination-unreachable or packet-too-big  are handled
> by the stateful inspection code (i.e. are matched by
> --state RELATED, ESTABLISHED) same as for IPv4?

The sample script in the RFC tries to handle both cases: kernel with and 
without IPv6 connection tracking (STATE_ENABLED shell variable).

Best regards,
Jozsef
-
E-mail  : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
          H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux