On Monday 2010-08-30 12:45, Jonathan Tripathy wrote: > you believe you have received > this email in error. My beliefs are not up to discussion here :-) > On 30/08/10 11:43, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> On Monday 2010-08-30 12:37, Jonathan Tripathy wrote: >> >>> 06:29:37.241590 IP6 2001:470:1f09:dc5::1> ff02::1:ff00:2: ICMP6, neighbor >>> solicitation, who has 2001:470:1f09:dc5::2, length 32 >>> 06:29:37.241800 IP6 2001:470:1f09:dc5::2> 2001:470:1f09:dc5::1: ICMP6, >>> neighbor advertisement, tgt is 2001:470:1f09:dc5::2, length 32 >>> >>> It seems like netfilter isn't marking the advertisements as "related" to the >>> solicitation request. I think that this is becuase the request was sent to >>> ff02::1:ff00:2, but the reply came from 2001:470:1f09:dc5::2. >>> >> advertisements need not strictly be a reply to a solicit. >> > > So how would I go about adding rules then that allows this? > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
