Re: Bridges

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan Engelhardt a écrit :
> On Thursday 2010-08-19 01:00, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
>>> It depends what "traffic" means. Ethernet frames, no. IP packets, yes if
>>> the box also acts as an IP router between the bridges.
>>>   
>> Hmm for such to happen, the bridge where the traffic came in on
>> would have to have an IP address, wouldn't it?
> 
> Routes are independent of assigned addresses.

Routes and addresses are not the only problem. IIRC, older kernels did
not automatically link an interface to the IP stack (it was not present
in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/) until you do something such as assign an IP
address to it.

> Though I guess it may 
> obstruct ICMP "TTL outlived" replies if the router itself has no address 
> to send with.

Obviously, a router needs at least one non-loopback address in order to
operate properly. If such an address is assigned to another interface,
Linux can use it as a source address on the unnumbered interface.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux