On 03/05/2010 16:01, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
My question is what DNAT or SNAT rules do we need to add to cave or to maar so
that remote *and local (originating from cave)* clients can make xmpp
connecitons on 443 and end up on cave:5222?\
Since they have all public addresses, no NAT is needed.
Just to clarify: both services run on one host. The second host (maar)
doesn't host any services and shouldn't. It's role in this is just
forwarding maar:443 -> cave:5222. Ordinarily I'd just have a listener
for xmpp on cave:443 but that's taken by apache. Hence this packet
wangling.
S.
--
Simon Tennant
+44 20 7043 6756 (UK - office)
+49 17 8545 0880 (Germany - mobile)
+49 89 4209 55854 (Germany - office)
skype: simontennant
xmpp: simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
