Re: NetFlow / sFlow / IPFIX network probe proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 04:33:10PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>   
>>>> Some bits and pieces may be missing on the kernel side if you need to
>>>> classify your flows though.  E. g. some IPFIX Aggregrators require the
>>>> DSCP value for that.
>>>>         
>> Adding DSCP doesn't work since we don't distinguish connections
>> by that.
>>     
>
> That patch would be easy, but I was unsure at that time whether DSCP was a
> "flow characteristic" enough, especially as you have something like the
> Netfilter DSCP target to modify it, and that possibly be done not from
> the very start of a flow.
>   
We certainly can't add it to the conntrack tuple, so I'm not sure
how that patch would work. But I'll gladly review it in case someone
takes a stab at this :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux