Re: NetFlow / sFlow / IPFIX network probe proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
>> Some bits and pieces may be missing on the kernel side if you need to
>> classify your flows though.  E. g. some IPFIX Aggregrators require the
>> DSCP value for that.
> 
> We can post a patch to add the missing stuff to ctnetlink.

Adding DSCP doesn't work since we don't distinguish connections
by that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux