Re: nat problem: What's so special with traffic from audibank.de?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lars Täuber wrote:
> Hi Mattias,
> 
> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:22:47 +0100 Mattias Rönnblom <hofors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I'll do some guessing here. It looks like the first large (MSS-sized)
>> segment is lost. I've seen this happening in networks where Path MTU
>> Discovery didn't work (because ICMP Fragmentation Needed was
>> filtered).
> 
> you're absolutely right.
> I could solve my problem with either allow any icmp traffic from outside to any destination or use the clamp-to-pmtu in the server settings for the firewall. This is a switch in fwbuilder.
> 
> Why is such an ICMP message not RELATED in the meaning of
>    echo "-A FORWARD -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT"
> with a _related_ tcp connection?

It should be. Please post a dump of the relevant ICMP message
and the connection tuples from /proc/net/nf_conntrack for the
original TCP connection.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux