On Saturday 2009-08-22 21:30, Rob Sterenborg wrote: >On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 15:57 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> Ah right. CentOS. Should have known. The platform where you can't >> deploy any modules, because during their backport spree, they failed >> to realize that external modules do rely on, say, < 2.6.22 _not_ >> having skb_*_header(), but skb->nh. I've given up on them. >> >> But thanks for the reminder. :) > >Since, as far as I understood, Centos is supposed to be a free and as >much as possible binary compatible replacement for RHEL, does this also >go for RHEL or is this behaviour Centos specific? With high probability this breakage extends to all RedHat Enterprise products with 2.6.18. (As a side note, they are not running a -stable either. v2.6.18.4-7-gfaed318 is absent, for example.) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
