Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] ipset-3.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 2009-08-22 21:30, Rob Sterenborg wrote:

>On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 15:57 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> Ah right. CentOS. Should have known. The platform where you can't
>> deploy any modules, because during their backport spree, they failed
>> to realize that external modules do rely on, say, < 2.6.22 _not_
>> having skb_*_header(), but skb->nh. I've given up on them.
>> 
>> But thanks for the reminder. :)
>
>Since, as far as I understood, Centos is supposed to be a free and as
>much as possible binary compatible replacement for RHEL, does this also
>go for RHEL or is this behaviour Centos specific?

With high probability this breakage extends to all RedHat Enterprise 
products with 2.6.18.
(As a side note, they are not running a -stable either.
v2.6.18.4-7-gfaed318 is absent, for example.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux