Re: Does nat rules take effect on local ip traffic?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



See http://jengelh.medozas.de/images/nf-packet-flow.png

/Oskar


2009/5/28 Sharevon <sharevon@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
>
> The scenario is like,
>
> There is a system, which has a LAN interface with ip 192.168.1.1/32
> and a WAN interface with ip, let's say, 10.0.0.1/32.
> There are some nat rules in nat table, trying to map traffic from
> {src:192.168.1.1:5000, dst:192.168.1.1:6000} to {src:10.0.0.1:6000,
> dst:10.0.0.2:5000}.
> Will this nat rules take effect on this local ip traffic?
>
> I mean if an application send a ip traffic with src:192.168.1.1:5000
> and dst:192.168.1.1:6000. Was nat rule supposed to be applied to
> change it to an ip traffic with src:10.0.0.1:6000 and
> dst:10.0.0.2:5000? or the system just send the ip traffic to
> 192.168.1.1:6000 directly without nat rules taking effect.
>
> In my system, it seems like nat rules didn't apply to the traffic,
> because another application on the other system with ip 10.0.0.2
> didn't receive any traffic on port 5000. But I'm not sure if other
> factors impact this, making it looks like the nat rules never be
> applied.
>
> Thanks
> Sean Feng
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux