Re: iptables - Trying to understand "no longer support implicit source local NAT"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Data Shock wrote:
My
linux box has a finicky program (let's call it the "Sender") on it that
refuses to send to 127.0.0.1.  However, I have another program running
on that same box that needs to receive the UDP traffic from the
Sender.  We'll call that one the "Receiver".  These two programs must
reside on the same device.

Is it that it can't send to 127.0.0.1 or is it the loopback interface that's the problem?

If it's just the IP number then you could use a stub host on a non-routed network. I.e.

ifconfig lo\:1 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 up

Now, if you can get your Receiver to listen to all the interfaces including the lo:1 interface and you can get your Sender to talk to 10.1.1.1 then you don't need to use NAT at all.


Jon.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux