iptables -j ROUTE -h gives identical output to iptables -h. Thanks for the tip though. Apparently ROUTE isn't going to solve my problem anyway. On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > Andy Theuninck a écrit : >> >> # iptables -t mangle -A INPUT -d 192.168.1.2 -s ! >> 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 -p udp --dport 500 -j ROUTE --iif eth0:1 >> iptables v1.3.5: Unknown arg `--iif' >> Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information. > > Maybe your iptables was build without the ROUTE support. What is the output > of : > > iptables -j ROUTE -h > > Unrelated to the error message, eth0:0 is not an interface name but an IP > alias label. Iptables rules require interface names such as eth0, not > aliases. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
