On Nov 04, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry, this setup is no longer supported. At least until we find a sane > way to do it. See http://conntrack-tools.netfilter.org/manual.html. > Also see: http://marc.info/?l=netfilter&m=122164806109759&w=2 Indeed I wondered about races between the traffic and state updates. Load sharing with a multicast MAC address and sources hashing would not help me because each one of my firewalls is connected to two core routers with no shared L2 domain between them (i.e. each router is connected to both firewalls). My real goal is not sharing load but supporting asymmetrical routing, because the firewalls announce the customer network to the core using an IGP. If I am not missing anything I could use OSPF and give a lower cost to the port with the higher VRRP priority. This way I would be able to use normal active/passive conntrack replication. -- ciao, Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
