I've successfully configured load balancing across multiple Ethernet uplinks. The setup is as follows: Uplinks: eth1: net=192.168.1.0/24, IP=192.168.1.130, Gateway=192.168.1.1 eth2: net=192.168.2.0/24, IP=192.168.2.131, Gateway=192.168.2.1 Routing: ip route add 192.168.1.0 dev eth1 src 192.168.1.130 table uplink1 ip route add default via 192.168.1.1 table uplink1 ip route add 192.168.2.0 dev eth2 src 192.168.2.131 table uplink2 ip route add default via 192.168.2.1 table uplink2 ip route add 192.168.1.0 dev eth1 src 192.168.1.130 ip route add 192.168.2.0 dev eth2 src 192.168.2.131 ip rule add from 192.168.1.130 table uplink1 ip rule add from 192.168.2.131 table uplink2 ip route add default scope global \ nexthop via 192.168.1.1 dev eth1 weight 1 \ nexthop via 192.168.2.1 dev eth2 weight 1 I've tried to change the routing to use two PPP uplinks as follows: Uplinks: ppp0: IP=174.150.202.179, P-t-P=68.28.241.69 ppp1: IP=70.11.196.32, P-t-P=68.28.249.69 Routing for: ip route add 68.28.241.69 dev ppp0 table uplink1 ip route add default via 174.150.202.179 table uplink1 ip route add 68.28.249.69 dev ppp1 table uplink2 ip route add default via 70.11.196.32 table uplink2 ip route add 68.28.241.69 dev ppp0 src 174.150.202.179 * ip route add 68.28.249.69 dev ppp1 src 70.11.196.32 * ip rule add from 174.150.202.179 table uplink1 ip rule add from 70.11.196.32 table uplink2 ip route add default scope global \ nexthop via 68.28.241.69 dev ppp0 weight 1 \ nexthop via 68.28.249.69 dev ppp1 weight 1 * These commands cause the following error: "RTNETLINK answers: File exists". I'm look for advice on what's wrong with the new setup for PPP devices. Thanks in advance. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
