RE: iptables-save ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eljas Alakulppi [mailto:Buzer@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 9:40 AM
> To: Joey; IPTables
> Subject: Re: iptables-save ?
> 
> First is the packets matched by this rule, second is bytes matched by this
> rule. In user-defined chains counters are always zero (of course, if the
> packet is matched by some of the rules, that rule's counter is updated).
> 
> -Eljas Alakulppi
> 

Hi Eljas,

So since I am generating this file through my own code should I put 
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]



> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:26:37 +0300, Joey <Joey@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > What significance do the numbers between the brackets have?
> >
> > print ":INPUT ACCEPT [6180932:1244590784]\n";
> > print ":OUTPUT ACCEPT [6574901:1313953477]\n";
> >
> > I got those from executing a iptables-save so I can see what format I
> > needed
> > to match in generating my own save file from our IP DB.
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Joey
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux