Re: What's required for a stateful firewall + ipvs in 2.6 kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/10/08 12:00, Brian Ghidinelli wrote:
That's the issue... there are a lot of posts about LVS and netfilter on Austintek.com and other sites but the dates range from 2000 to 2006 or so making it hard to figure out what's current.

*nod*  This is the case with a lot of things, not just LVS.

In sysadmining, I don't really like to be the pioneer. :) No one else has turned an RHEL box into a Firewall + LVS Director?

I doubt that you are the first, but I don't know that others have documented things for people to find.

I believe keepalived synchronizes the LVS connections between ipvs on the two boxes. There is a config option "lvs_sync_daemon_inteface" for this (as I understand it).

Ok...

This is only half the picture though, and conntrackd appears to solve the other half by also keeping netfilter in sync about which connections are already established or related so iptables rules don't kill valid sessions.

*nod*

So in the end I suppose the real question is whether or not anyone has successfully used the Antefacto patches on RHEL? I will try the lvs-users mailing list for that one...

Please follow up with what you find so others searching this archive in the future will have some information.

Thanks for the help Grant,

You are welcome.



Grant. . . .
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux