Re: Redirecting ports in a bridge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 2008-04-23 19:16, Grant Taylor wrote:

> On 04/23/08 10:24, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> Often layer-2 transparency is not needed, but what do I know. If you just log
>> layer-3 (IP addrs) and up without caring about MAC addresses, make a standard
>> routing setup, i.e. 192.168.1.0/22 on eth0, 192.168.2.0/22 on eth1, and
>> enable forwarding; kinda like that. And let hosts use 192.168.1.1/192.168.2.1
>> as a default gw (as they already should do).
>
> If it was not for the fact that the OP wanted layer 3 transparency, I would
> agree with you.  However the desire to insert this between a router and one or
> more systems with out changing the IP addressing necessitates the use of layer
> 2 technology, i.e. bridging.

Well what routes do clients have at the moment?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux