I need the bridge because the appliance is supposed to be totally
trasparent to the network, as its main use is logging traffic.
It just has an IP address for administration purposes, but it doesn't
really need it. Anyway, I can disable bridging as it's an appliance with
a closed configuration.
Jan Engelhardt escribió:
On Friday 2008-04-18 12:55, Javier Prieto Martínez wrote:
You're right. I'll try again:
* LAN1 (192.168.1.0/22)
[CLIENTS]--- [ROUTER (.7)]
* LAN2 (192.168.2.0/22)
[ROUTER (.7)] -- [APPLIANCE (.40)] -- SERVERS (.1&.2)
IF you do bridge, then despite cabling being correct, you get
a NAT shortcircuit: jengelh.medozas.de/images/dnat-mistake.png
That's probably the problem, as far as I've seen with TCPDump. The point is,
how can I fix that shortcut?
You do not seem to need a bridge.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
