I'm using tcpdump for testing, but my appliance has it's own Java client
for that purpose.
Marc Cozzi escribió:
Jan,
Can I ask what you are using for traffic logging
on your bridge? I am in need of fairly decent accounting
software for all traffic passing through the bridge.
HTTP, P2P, SSH etc. Bytes, time, IP# and so forth.
Regards,
--marc
-----Original Message-----
From: netfilter-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:netfilter-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Javier
Prieto Martínez
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 7:41 AM
To: Jan Engelhardt; netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Redirecting ports in a bridge
I need the bridge because the appliance is supposed to be
totally trasparent to the network, as its main use is logging traffic.
It just has an IP address for administration purposes, but it
doesn't really need it. Anyway, I can disable bridging as
it's an appliance with a closed configuration.
Jan Engelhardt escribió:
On Friday 2008-04-18 12:55, Javier Prieto Martínez wrote:
You're right. I'll try again:
* LAN1 (192.168.1.0/22)
[CLIENTS]--- [ROUTER (.7)]
* LAN2 (192.168.2.0/22)
[ROUTER (.7)] -- [APPLIANCE (.40)] -- SERVERS (.1&.2)
IF you do bridge, then despite cabling being correct, you
get a NAT
shortcircuit: jengelh.medozas.de/images/dnat-mistake.png
That's probably the problem, as far as I've seen with TCPDump. The
point is, how can I fix that shortcut?
You do not seem to need a bridge.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
netfilter"
in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More
majordomo
info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
netfilter" in the body of a message to
majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
