Re: Packets not traversing the POSTROUTING table?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:alpine.LNX.1.10.0804082106570.2229@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> On Tuesday 2008-04-08 20:15, Eric B. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Sorry, but what is the LOGMARK target?  I can't seem to find that
>>>>target anywhere in the docs or the man pages.  I've seen the LOG
>>>>target and the MARK target, but not sure what the LOGMARK target
>>>>is.
>>>
>>> Similar to LOG but instead of dumping the packet data, it dumps
>>> the associated Netfilter metastructures.
>>
>>I'm not sure I follow.  I'm using iptables v1.2.11, and I've tried the
>>following command, but as I feared, LOGMARK is an unknown target for my
>>version.  Is there a way to get the logmark target for my version, or do I
>>need to update the entire package?
>
> LOGMARK is an extension I wrote, and it being in the xtables-addons
> package menas you need kernel 2.6.18 at least (but newer is always
> better, we are approaching 2.6.25), and the xtables base package.

*sigh* Running enterprise servers precludes me from manually installing 
those kernels.   Although I'm not quite sure what release 67 of the RH 
kernel includes as updates to the 2.6.9 kernel...  Might there be any chance 
of it working on the RH 2.6.9-67 kernel?

> Oh the joy of enterprise distros...
One of the necessary side effects of running entreprise servers, I guess....

Thanks again,

Eric



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux