I'm not sure if I understand you correctly but take a look at policy based routing and check if that can help you in any way. http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.html /Regards Oscar > I have a question for you. I hope you are the correct or a good > person to ask this question of. I have a linux box with two ethernet > interfaces. I would like them to be treated as two separate interfaces > that are not hooked to the same network. Both interfaces should run > Zeroconf and have independent IP address. The second ehternet address is > on a private network from the first ehternet address. Currently I am not > using iptables but could use it to do connection tracking. What is > currently happening is > 1. eth0 is configured and gets a zeroconf IP address. > 2. routing tables set to route all outbound packets for zeroconf out eth0. > 3. eth0 is working correctly > 4. eth1 is configured and gets a different zeroconf IP address. > 5. An incoming packet from eth1 is received and processed, since the > response is to go out to a zeroconf IP address, the response goes out > eth0. The computer connected on eth1 does not see the response. > > > Could this be solved with running IP tables and doing connection > tracking? or is more complex? > > Thank You for your time and any help you can give > Kendrick Hamilton > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
