Re: NAT for multiple non-directly connected subnets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/11/2007, Bradley Kite <bradley.kite@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 08/11/2007, Matt Zagrabelny <mzagrabe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 22:17 +0000, Bradley Kite wrote:
> > > On 08/11/2007, Matt Zagrabelny <mzagrabe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
[snip]
>
> I tried this with the same results I'm afraid. If I cannot get this
> working then I'll have to make the upstream router do NAT too so that
> the entire network is seen from the address of the up-stream router -
> as Linux is NATing that address without problems.
>
> Or maybe I'll try a kernel upgrade to see if that makes any difference.

Hmm. I've tried also with the latest kernel (2.6.23) but I still have
the same problem.

Has any body else managed to get something like this working before?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux