Re: NAT for multiple non-directly connected subnets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/11/2007, Matt Zagrabelny <mzagrabe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 22:17 +0000, Bradley Kite wrote:
> > On 08/11/2007, Matt Zagrabelny <mzagrabe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > Perhaps do some logging (-j LOG) or check the counters on the various
> > > chains.
> > >
> > > # iptables -t nat -L -v -n
> >
> > Hmm. The pre-routing couters are increasing, but that is all. When I
> > ping from the router then the post-routing counters increase (because
> > its directly connected).
>
> Is your rp_filter getting in the way?
>
> # cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth1/rp_filter
>
> If this returns 1, then:
>
> # echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth1/rp_filter
>
> Of course setting it in /etc/sysctl.conf for reboots.
>
> --

I tried this with the same results I'm afraid. If I cannot get this
working then I'll have to make the upstream router do NAT too so that
the entire network is seen from the address of the up-stream router -
as Linux is NATing that address without problems.

Or maybe I'll try a kernel upgrade to see if that makes any difference.

Many thanks for your help.

--
Brad.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux