RE: [nf-failover] conntrack and conntrackd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I observed that when creating conntrack record using conntrack tool, no
event is catched (using conntrack -E). That might be reason why the
record is not in conntrackd's cache. Is that true? If yes, does anybody
know why creating the record this way doesn't fire the event?

Thanks

Michal Filka

> -----Original Message-----
> From: netfilter-failover-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:netfilter-failover-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Filka Michal
> Sent: 30. srpna 2007 13:41
> To: netfilter-failover@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [nf-failover] conntrack and conntrackd
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've problem when using conntrack and conntrackd.
> 
> I tried to create a record using conntrack. But, I didn't see the
record
> in conntrackd cache neither on MASTER even BACKUP. However, I can see
> the record in conntrack (conntrack -L)
> 
> Does it meen that conntrackd isn't able to synchronize manually
created
> conntrack records?
> 
> Michal Filka
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-failover



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux