On 08/21/07 15:47, michel banguerski wrote:
Grant, You are 100% right about return path, it needs to be set up and I hope the VRF will prove to be more adequate for your needs.
Michel, thank you for your help. I will keep what you have pointed out in mind. However for now I'm pursuing the VRF route as I think it will better handle my problem and scale better, especially considering I need to not NAT what is coming out of eth1 on its way to eth2.
I'll keep everyone apprised on what I find out. Thanks again, Grant. . . .
