Re: SNAT before IPSec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Grant,

to be honest, reading, re-reading before the rfc the same doubt come to my mind but now, my understanding is that the paragraph is really doing reference to an interface to manage the traffic according to the policies defined.

Jorge Davila.

On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:53:33 -0500
 Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 6/5/2007 3:45 PM, Jorge Davila wrote:
For every IPsec implementation, there MUST be an administrative interface that allows a user or system administrator to manage the SPD. Specifically, every inbound or outbound packet is subject to processing by IPsec and the SPD must specify what action will be taken in each case. Thus the administrative interface must allow the user (or system administrator) to specify the security processing to be applied to any packet entering or exiting the system, on a packet by packet basis.

I take this to mean some sort of management point, not necissarily a network interface managed by ifconfig. Or did I misunderstand your earlier comment to mean the management point?



Grant. . . .



Jorge Isaac Davila Lopez
Nicaragua Open Source
+505 430 5462
davila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux