On Jun 3 2007 01:07, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: >On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 23:46:46 +0200, Jan Engelhardt said: > >> along comes xt_u32, a revamped ipt_u32, > >+1 for doing this - I've been dragging along a local ipt_u32 patch for a while, >and been wishing it had ipv6 support. > >> * Reduced the buffer size to 17 KB. I think that is quite ok since >> I added an overflow check, SHOULD THERE BE ANY device with an >> MTU larger than our loopback masterpiece (16436 bytes). >> >> Are there such devices that support Megasuperjumboframes? > >IP over Infiniband? I think those have some outrageous MTU? Personally, >I wouldn't need it for anything bigger than 9K ethernet jumbograms, but >that one's a decision for others. Can you find out? For such supersize packets, I'd like to switch to kmalloc/vmalloc rather than keeping a big buffer in the .bss. Jan --
