Sietse van Zanen wrote:
Uh, no I think I may be wrong here. That might only count for NAT packets.The 600.000 bytes might be due to compression. How did you download the file?
Just discovered that that was the right values, but of the upload! :) I was wrong because now, with the right "download" rule (so a rule that see the traffic "to" and not from the test machine)!
-Sietse
Thanks, Michele
