Re: iptables-retore very slow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



iptables-restore has some flags that could be useful: --verbose,
--test (to prevent the actual sending back to the kernel), --noflush
(to prevent flushing already existing chains)

If that doesn't help at all, you could either use strace to find if it
is hanging on a syscall, or add #define DEBUG to the top of
iptables-restore.c and recompile to enable more debugging output.

Are there rules on tables other than filter? Those aren't flushed by
iptables -F and could possibly be slowing it down if there were many
of them.

Hope that helps,
Daniel De Graaf

On 3/5/07, Rackage | Randles <randles@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

I recently noticed that one of my firewalls was taking a very long time
to reboot. Which was odd as its a very new  machine.

On investigation is seemed to be the iptables-restore command that was
adding 10+ minutes to the boot-up times.

I ran iptables-restore from a terminal and found that it was indeed
taking an amazingly long time.

Obviously I assumed it was related to the rules on the server, so I
flushed all rules and all user defined tables from the firewall (nat,
mangle and filter) and used iptables-save which took less than 1
millisecond :) on the empty rule set.

However iptables-restore is still taking 10+ minutes even with no rules
to read / apply.

Has anyone seen the behaviour before?  or has anybody got some bright
ideas on how I might continue debugging this issue?

Thanks in Advance

Regards

Ben





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux