-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Jan Engelhardt a écrit :
I may be wrong, but doing IP NAT on a bridge seems to me quite unnatural
and
troublesome.
A bridge is like a 'direct connection' so you cannot use NAT.
My idea of a bridge is a kind of software switch.
Then why did you mention "setting up your proxy box as bridge" ?
My understanding of a bridge, is that it is a transparent connector of two
distinct broadcast domains. At least in their earlier and older first
implementations.
Perhaps I'm showing my age?!...
Thanks,
Ron DuFresne
- --
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
admin & senior security consultant: sysinfo.com
http://sysinfo.com
Key fingerprint = 9401 4B13 B918 164C 647A E838 B2DF AFCC 94B0 6629
...We waste time looking for the perfect lover
instead of creating the perfect love.
-Tom Robbins <Still Life With Woodpecker>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF0iNMst+vzJSwZikRArxJAKCMgPfeSo2PM2P0USICMHA4w+I8kQCeOJ9V
iYBgKm6pJHhmI6fOxT7QpKQ=
=pj67
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
