Re: Shouldn't this rule catch all packets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2006-12-14, jwlargent <jwlargent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was trying to debug some errors in my iptables setup so I added the following rules to my OUTPUT, just to see what packets were going out.

iptables -A OUTPUT -m state --state NEW,RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
iptables -A OUTPUT -j ACCEPT

When I do iptables -L OUTPUT -v it shows some packets are falling through to the last rule.
Shouldn't the first rule catch all the packets?

No. There exists forth state called INVALID. E.g. TCP packet with ACK
witch is not part of any tracked TCP connection is INVALID. Naturally,
INVALID packets are ill packets and they shoudn't appear, but the reality
is different.

-- Petr

So I put in a log rule for --state INVALID and sure enough thats what it was.
The packets are part of my ssh connection, tcp with ACK.

IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx DST=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx LEN=276 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=1146 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=22 DPT=38858 WINDOW=3228 RES=0x00 ACK PSH URGP=0



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux