Re: Is ip_conntrack_ftp needed for 1:1 nat?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robert LeBlanc a écrit :
the FTP protocol contains the source IP and port,

The _destination_ address and port.

which wouldn't
make sense since it is a private address. At least that is what I
understand of the FTP protocol.

Are there any other protocols that have issues like this that I'm not
aware of?

You can have an idea by looking at the available conntrack/NAT helper modules (ip_conntrack_* and ip_nat_*) for the Linux kernel : IRC DCC (file transfer and peer to peer communication with an IRC client), TFTP, PPTP, some communication/multimedia/peer to peer protocols such as H.323/Netmeeting, RTSP, SIP, MSN Messenger, DirectX, MMS (Microsoft Streaming Media), Talk...



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux