Re: Problem with state match for ip6tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Problem with state match for ip6tables
From: Graham Murray <graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:23:37 +0000
In-reply-to: <200602131530.k1DFUhTI005947@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Yasuyuki KOZAKAI's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:30:43 +0900 (JST)")
References: <20060210145631.1726fd0d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200602130416.k1D4GP73019763@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8764njipgp.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200602131530.k1DFUhTI005947@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Yasuyuki KOZAKAI <yasuyuki.kozakai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Sorry, I was wrong. nf_conntrack lives in kernel >= 2.6.15,
> but only kernel >= 2.6.16 supports IPv6 state match.

Thanks. I thought it was in 2.6.15, that is why I asked.

References:
- Re: Problem with state match for ip6tables
  - From: Frederic Beck
- Re: Problem with state match for ip6tables
  - From: Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
- Re: Problem with state match for ip6tables
  - From: Graham Murray

Prev by Date: RE: [OT] Strange bash phenomenon
Next by Date: Re: SNAT round-robin broken?
Previous by thread: Re: Problem with state match for ip6tables
Next by thread: address ranges for DNAT?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux