Re: Fwd: Re: Performance issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:01:56PM +0000, tmp123@xxxxxxxxxxxxx told us:
> > Regardless of your success in the past with 3com NICs, I
> > would suggest using something... ANYTHING... else. 

sorry to jump in here (and, yes, this is a bit off topic, sorry for
that), but did I miss something?? In the past I mainly used 3com
NICs (3c509C and even more in the past 3c900B) and I never had any
problems with them...now as gigabit ethernet is common, Intel's e1000
are the "usual" NICs in our machines...


Sven

> > 3C90x's have been the bane of my existence ever since they
> > came out in the late 90s.  If there is an S3 video chipset
> > on that motherboard, it's a lost cause.

-- 
Linux zion.homelinux.com 2.6.13-mm1_2 #2 Thu Sep 8 01:40:47 CEST 2005 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
 19:14:38 up 6 days, 22:48,  2 users,  load average: 0.02, 0.03, 0.00

Attachment: pgpyPkM1fhHZH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux