Re: is this the zillionth mail asking for this detail?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: is this the zillionth mail asking for this detail?
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:21:28 +0200 (MEST)
Cc: netfilter <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507211511240.27131@blackhole.kfki.hu>
References: <65aa6af905072021501603cfd5@mail.gmail.com> <42DF85AE.1000400@gmx.co.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507211511240.27131@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>local process -> routing -> OUTPUT chain -> routing -> POSTROUTING chain
>
>No problem with policy routing for the locally generated traffic.

This sounds like a total overhead calculating the route twice.



Jan Engelhardt
--

Follow-Ups:
- Re: is this the zillionth mail asking for this detail?
  - From: Jozsef Kadlecsik

References:
- is this the zillionth mail asking for this detail?
  - From: Edmundo Carmona
- Re: is this the zillionth mail asking for this detail?
  - From: /dev/rob0
- Re: is this the zillionth mail asking for this detail?
  - From: Jozsef Kadlecsik

Prev by Date: Re: is this the zillionth mail asking for this detail?
Next by Date: Re: is this the zillionth mail asking for this detail?
Previous by thread: Re: is this the zillionth mail asking for this detail?
Next by thread: Re: is this the zillionth mail asking for this detail?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux