Re: patch-o-matic'd TTL, but it's not there

To: Andrew Schulman <andrex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: patch-o-matic'd TTL, but it's not there
From: George Alexandru Dragoi <waruiinu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 03:31:05 -0400
Cc: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hE9J6Rn2SR5f/TO9EF0nrOBoVCU0/w7fskmaAuie/uy3GWqovpZWRuRWXhEDodwzpO8i+aJRxtKnC2Z83xiCE5wkntrhrkEYTEWVYOpFhJo9bzfjftICeQZop9v4U0TcYqLNZNmqVjDVv60TbUz5iW3DAnZ7UeQxB4cpyERhLnU=
In-reply-to: <daaei7$l6c$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <ffcea5260507021324388edaa8@mail.gmail.com> <daaei7$l6c$1@sea.gmane.org>
Reply-to: George Alexandru Dragoi <waruiinu@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I thinnk you should specify the full path to new iptables binary.

References:
- patch-o-matic'd TTL, but it's not there
  - From: Erik Weber
- Re: patch-o-matic'd TTL, but it's not there
  - From: Andrew Schulman