Re: Stateless NAT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Matin Tamizi <mtamizi@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Stateless NAT
From: Feizhou <feizhou@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 09:40:36 +0800
Cc: NetFilter <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <f68a4160506070827307b0080@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f68a4160506070827307b0080@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)

I appreciate any suggestions on how I could correct my setup so I can
use stateless.


You don't use netfilter. You use iproute2.

http://linux-ip.net/html/nat-stateless.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stateless NAT
  - From: Guenter . Sprakties

References:
- Stateless NAT
  - From: Matin Tamizi

Prev by Date: Re: Re: Route traffic per protocol - it is possible?
Next by Date: Routing and DNAT question
Previous by thread: Stateless NAT
Next by thread: Re: Stateless NAT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux