Re: Nice ZoneAlarm that might be useful for Iptables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:12:36AM +0800, Feizhou wrote:
> I disagree. We do not have to provide a Zone Alarm clone. Its 
> functionality of checking what processes can use the network though 
> would be useful in providing mandatory controls on what processes get to 
> talk to the outside world.
> 
> Right now there is simply no such ability. Having this on say a server 
> will prevent users from looking around the network if they have shell 
> access or sending info/data out. Obviously only root should be able to 
> see the list of process names allowed and the other conditions like uid 
> and ports allowed to use by the process.

http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/

the mere act of saying something on a public mailing list doesn't make
it true.

-j

--
"Lois: What's going on?
 Stewie: We're playing house.
 Lois: The boy is all tied up.
 Stewie: Roman Polanski's house."
        --Family Guy


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux