this is after your email my current setup. iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j SNAT --to 10.2.2.1 iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.1.3 -j SNAT --to 192.168.0.141 and #!/bin/bash IF1=eth0 #Provider 1 P1=10.2.2.1 #Provider 2 P2=192.168.0.173 ip route add default via $P2 table T2 ip rule add from 192.168.1.3 table T2 ip route flush cache can't i keep it like that? or i have to set T1 too? thanks. On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 12:41 -0400, Jason Opperisano wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 07:20:33PM +0300, Sadus . wrote: > > The Multi routing doc is another scenario that includes sharing or load > > balancing between 2 providers to the same machine, that's not what i > > want. > > > > I tried using iproute2 and iptables (SNAT), but i just don't know what > > to set as default gw for PC2, since PC2 can't see Provider 2 unless the > > gateway of PC2 is the Linux GW (since it got ipforward). > > > > thanks > > something like: > > echo 201 T1 >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables > echo 202 T2 >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables > > ip route add default via $P1 table T1 > ip route add default via $P2 table T2 > > ip rule add from $PC1 table T1 > ip rule add from $PC2 table T2 > > ip route flush cache > > with this packets from $PC1 will be routed via $P1, and packets from > $PC2 will be routed via $P2. you can set the default gateway of the > linux GW to whichever you prefer. > > i am assuming in this scenario that both PC1 and PC2 are being SNAT-ed > to the IP of Linux GW's eth0 interface, and that is OK with P1 and P2. > > the default gateway of both PC1 and PC1 is just the internal IP of Linux > GW, in any case. > > -j > > -- > "Brian: Peter, did you read the fine print on this loan contract? > Peter: If by "read", you mean "imagine the naked lady", then yes." > --Family Guy >
