Re: Network number getting mangled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 05:17:30PM -0500, Daniel J. Brennan wrote:
> > your example of 10.0.168.0/22, actually does define a network
> > ID--10.0.168.0 - 10.0.171.255
> > 
> > as to what value you actually want--i have no idea.
> > 
> > say what you mean and mean what you say.
> 
> Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. I need to revisit the math, but
> the public IP space range is XX.XX.168.0 - XX.XX.175.255. It has a netmask 

which would be:  x.x.168.0/21

> of 255.255.242.

ahh...no...  255.255.248.0 maybe?

> As I said the private space mirrors this IP space.
> This is a legitimate public IP subnet. How do I define it to iptables,
> since the public IP space is not as I would expect in iptables either.

as a /21...

this message on IP Subnetting has been brought to you by the letter 'S.'

-j

--
"Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates
 us from the animals...except the weasel."
        --The Simpsons


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux