On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 02:22:41PM -0800, Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 CS/SCBN wrote:
> jason,
>
> sorry, but your gonna' hear this anyway...but its not negative..
> i just wanna know why?
>
> okay...here is what i'm sure will think is a dumb question.
>
> why not make life simple for all concerned [servers, clients and routers, too...]
>
> re-numbering the subnets...or just one and --- voila! problem gone !!!!
>
> this might be too simplistic for this list (he! he! he!) but lets say...
>
> eth0@server = 192.168.100.0/24
> eth0@client = 192.168.100.1/24
>
> eth1@server = 172.16.1.0/24
> eth1@client = 162.16.1.1/24
>
> or whatever...whats the problem?
>
> i think also the statement below may be have some validity
> if this is as easy as i think it is.
>
> where's the difficiulty.
>
> complex is bad.
> simple is good.
i agree with you one hundred thousand gabillion (is that a
glavin?) percent. judging from the posts in this thread--i believe
properly configuring IP is an unacceptable solution for the OP.
-j
--
"Ah, good ol' trustworthy beer. My love for you will never die."
--The Simpsons
