Re: NAT with REDIRECT #$%@ up...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jason Opperisano wrote:

according to packet 6 in your capture, your proxy requires
authentication.  you cannot combine authentication and transparent
proxying; which will makes perfect sense if you think about it long
enough.

as far as the checksum errors go--do you have an IP bound to br0?


No its far more stupid then that, in a tired nightly hour I did set netmask 255.255.255.0 on br0 where it should be 255.0.0.0, when my client tryes to reach the proxy
at port 3128 i HAS to go througt my gateway since it the only way thay can reach each other. Strangely enough thay can.


Natually it will generate errors when the bridge tryed to trick the client posing af the gateway.

Thanks anyway.

PS - amongst my friends i have a mouth like a sailor, but i don't see
how it's appropriate to set a subject line as you did, no matter how
frustrated you may be.

Sorry about that, no fence meant by it...

I'am very happy with IPTables and respect those how contributed to it. Thanks guys.

-Lennart


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux