Re: transparent bridge troubles?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 03:55:58PM -0500, mdpeters wrote:
> OK. This is what I have loaded now.
> 
> /usr/local/sbin/iptables -P FORWARD DROP
> /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -j LOG --log-prefix 
> /var/iptablequeue/pre_queue
> /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --syn -m state --state NEW -j 
> QUEUE
> /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m state --state 
> RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j QUEUE
> /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -p udp -j QUEUE
> /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -p icmp -j QUEUE
> /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -j LOG --log-prefix 
> /var/iptablequeue/post_queue
> 
> I should see some sort of log file in /var/iptablequeue/post_queue or 
> /var/iptablequeue/pre_queue now? Should I try sending packets through the 
> bridge to generate something?

uh--no.  those rules might not even load.  "--log-prefix" specifies a
string to prefix the log entries in your syslog files.  my rules were
literal:

/usr/local/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -j LOG --log-prefix "PRE QUEUE: "

...

/usr/local/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -j LOG --log-prefix "POST QUEUE: "

so the entries in /var/log/messages will have the strings "PRE QUEUE: "
and "POST QUEUE: " in them for identification purposes.

-j

--
"Kids, you tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is,
 never try."
        --The Simpsons


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux